Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

Main page Policy Latest Posts Abbreviations

Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ceylan – Turkey, 2021-11-19 16:46 (1030 d 05:50 ago) – Posting: # 22676
Views: 2,407

Hi,

For PK bioequivalence, 90% confidence interval is ok both for US and EMA.

For PD bioequivalence, I want to ask about the confidence interval for US and EMA?
Is it 90% CI for US and 95% CI for EMA?

And in what circumstances, 90 % CI and / or 95 % CI are being used?

Thank you,

Best Regards,

Ceylan

Complete thread:

Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalenceceylan 2021-11-19 15:46 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence ElMaestro 2021-11-19 16:22
  - Primary pharmacodynamic bioequivalence ceylan 2021-11-20 23:14

Admin contact
23,225 posts in 4,879 threads, 1,652 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty. Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz