’Percentage’ of few values [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2021-10-21 18:57 (1115 d 08:45 ago) – Posting: # 22652
Views: 2,961

Hello Helmut,

❝ Since I attended these early conference, I can confirm it… However, speaking of ‘percentages’ of <100 values is unfortunate at least and \(\small{\geq \small{^{2}/_{3}}}\) was meant indeed. 67% is stupid and 66.7% or 66.67% hardly better.

❝ I one insists in a percentage, it should be written as \(\small{\geq66.6666666666\ldots\%}\) or \(\small{\geq66.\dot{6}\%}\). ;-)


So almost all (Regulatory Assessors) agree that 2/3=66.66666667%=66.67%=67%=Accepted run.;-)

Regards,
Qualityassurance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,291 posts in 4,891 threads, 1,661 registered users;
78 visitors (0 registered, 78 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:42 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I never did anything worth doing by accident,
nor did any of my inventions come by accident;
they came by work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5