’Percentage’ of few values [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – Jordan, 2021-10-21 16:57 (338 d 07:17 ago) – Posting: # 22652
Views: 1,227

Hello Helmut,

» Since I attended these early conference, I can confirm it… However, speaking of ‘percentages’ of <100 values is unfortunate at least and \(\small{\geq \small{^{2}/_{3}}}\) was meant indeed. 67% is stupid and 66.7% or 66.67% hardly better.
» I one insists in a percentage, it should be written as \(\small{\geq66.6666666666\ldots\%}\) or \(\small{\geq66.\dot{6}\%}\). ;-)

So almost all (Regulatory Assessors) agree that 2/3=66.66666667%=66.67%=67%=Accepted run.;-)

Regards,
Qualityassurance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,385 posts in 4,684 threads, 1,594 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 00:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You really don’t know what you don’t know until you write about it.
Then, everyone knows what you don’t know.    Rod Machado

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5