’Percentage’ of few values [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – Jordan, 2021-10-21 16:57 (213 d 04:36 ago) – Posting: # 22652
Views: 1,025

Hello Helmut,

» Since I attended these early conference, I can confirm it… However, speaking of ‘percentages’ of <100 values is unfortunate at least and \(\small{\geq \small{^{2}/_{3}}}\) was meant indeed. 67% is stupid and 66.7% or 66.67% hardly better.
» I one insists in a percentage, it should be written as \(\small{\geq66.6666666666\ldots\%}\) or \(\small{\geq66.\dot{6}\%}\). ;-)

So almost all (Regulatory Assessors) agree that 2/3=66.66666667%=66.67%=67%=Accepted run.;-)


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 21:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz