’Percentage’ of few values [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2021-10-21 18:57 (780 d 12:46 ago) – Posting: # 22652
Views: 1,716

Hello Helmut,

❝ Since I attended these early conference, I can confirm it… However, speaking of ‘percentages’ of <100 values is unfortunate at least and \(\small{\geq \small{^{2}/_{3}}}\) was meant indeed. 67% is stupid and 66.7% or 66.67% hardly better.

❝ I one insists in a percentage, it should be written as \(\small{\geq66.6666666666\ldots\%}\) or \(\small{\geq66.\dot{6}\%}\). ;-)

So almost all (Regulatory Assessors) agree that 2/3=66.66666667%=66.67%=67%=Accepted run.;-)


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,823 posts in 4,786 threads, 1,633 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:43 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz