’Percentage’ of few values [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2021-10-21 18:57 (1002 d 03:58 ago) – Posting: # 22652
Views: 2,535

Hello Helmut,

❝ Since I attended these early conference, I can confirm it… However, speaking of ‘percentages’ of <100 values is unfortunate at least and \(\small{\geq \small{^{2}/_{3}}}\) was meant indeed. 67% is stupid and 66.7% or 66.67% hardly better.

❝ I one insists in a percentage, it should be written as \(\small{\geq66.6666666666\ldots\%}\) or \(\small{\geq66.\dot{6}\%}\). ;-)

So almost all (Regulatory Assessors) agree that 2/3=66.66666667%=66.67%=67%=Accepted run.;-)


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
23,112 posts in 4,858 threads, 1,644 registered users;
91 visitors (0 registered, 91 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Skill is a function of chance.
It’s an intuitive best-use of chance situations.    Philip K. Dick

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz