’Percentage’ of few values [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-10-20 16:06 (471 d 03:21 ago) – Posting: # 22649
Views: 1,430

Hi Ohlbe & Qualityassurance,

❝ The wording in the EMA guideline is indeed not ideal. To interpret it, let's move back in history.


Since I attended these early conference, I can confirm it… However, speaking of ‘percentages’ of <100 values is unfortunate at least and \(\small{\geq \small{^{2}/_{3}}}\) was meant indeed. 67% is stupid and 66.7% or 66.67% hardly better.
I one insists in a percentage, it should be written as \(\small{\geq66.6666666666\ldots\%}\) or \(\small{\geq66.\dot{6}\%}\). ;-)

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,478 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,604 registered users;
15 visitors (0 registered, 15 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:28 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Learning of many things
does not teach intelligence.    Heraclitus of Ephesus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5