Acceptance criteria of analytical run [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2021-10-19 17:25 (1311 d 03:42 ago) – Posting: # 22641
Views: 3,933

Dear dshah, ElMaestro and Ohlbe,

Thank you for the response.

Further the CRO's SOP is equally important as many times the SOP's are stringent compared to guideline (to keep a single SOP for many regulaotries).

May we specify in our SOP that 2/3 (67%) of the QC should be within ±15% of the nominal values? or It is advisable to reject such runs (having 66.67% passed QCs)?

Regards,
Qualityassurance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,683 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Being really good at C++ is like being really good
at using rocks to sharpen sticks.    Thant Tessman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5