Acceptance criteria of analytical run [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – Jordan, 2021-10-19 15:25 (49 d 19:26 ago) – Posting: # 22641
Views: 613

Dear dshah, ElMaestro and Ohlbe,

Thank you for the response.

Further the CRO's SOP is equally important as many times the SOP's are stringent compared to guideline (to keep a single SOP for many regulaotries).

May we specify in our SOP that 2/3 (67%) of the QC should be within ±15% of the nominal values? or It is advisable to reject such runs (having 66.67% passed QCs)?

Regards,
Qualityassurance

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,788 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 09:51 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There is no adequate defense, except stupidity,
against the impact of a new idea.    Percy Williams Bridgman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5