Acceptance criteria of analytical run [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by qualityassurance – 2021-10-19 17:25 (1306 d 08:40 ago) – Posting: # 22641
Views: 3,895

Dear dshah, ElMaestro and Ohlbe,

Thank you for the response.

Further the CRO's SOP is equally important as many times the SOP's are stringent compared to guideline (to keep a single SOP for many regulaotries).

May we specify in our SOP that 2/3 (67%) of the QC should be within ±15% of the nominal values? or It is advisable to reject such runs (having 66.67% passed QCs)?

Regards,
Qualityassurance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
191 visitors (0 registered, 191 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing shocks me. I’m a scientist.    Harrison Ford (as Indiana Jones)

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5