Acceptance criteria of analytical run [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by dshah  – India/United Kingdom, 2021-10-18 12:36 (216 d 10:03 ago) – Posting: # 22634
Views: 1,215

(edited by dshah on 2021-10-18 19:13)

Dear Qualityassurance!
I believe that the run shall be rejected. As per guidlence-" In case these criteria are not fulfilled the analytical run should be rejected, and the study samples re-extracted and analysed." Further the CRO's SOP is equally important as many times the SOP's are stringent compared to guideline (to keep a single SOP for many regulaotries).

» What if we have 12 QCs in run (3 replicates of each Low, Low-mid, Mid and High) and 1 replicate of each Low, Low-mid, Mid and High failed leading to pass 66.67% of QCs (8 out of 12).
» May we accept the analytical run and considered as pass? :confused::confused:

The point of interest is weather all the QC's in same sequence failed? There could be error in sampling sequence or levels failed in different sequence?
Ideally 1 more passes sample to meet the acceptance criteria may have qualified the analytical run.

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 101 (0 registered, 101 guests [including 92 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 22:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz