Acceptance criteria of analytical run [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-10-18 10:35 (1342 d 09:26 ago) – Posting: # 22632
Views: 4,179

Hi quallityassurance,

❝ What if we have 12 QCs in run (3 replicates of each Low, Low-mid, Mid and High) and 1 replicate of each Low, Low-mid, Mid and High failed leading to pass 66.67% of QCs (8 out of 12).


❝ May we accept the analytical run and considered as pass? :confused::confused:



I think the run passed when 2/3 were ok.
I agree the wording leads to some confusion but here you should be ok. 2/3 in unrounded percent is 67. :-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
52 visitors (0 registered, 52 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5