Threshold of % change? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Ben – 2021-10-17 14:16 (710 d 09:24 ago) – Posting: # 22630
Views: 1,975

Hi Helmut,

I forgot to answer...

❝ When it comes to a test, see the end of Section 1 in this post (EUFEPS workshop, Bonn, June 2013).

Thanks, I more and more come to the same conclusion...

❝ ❝ Is there a way to define quantitative thresholds based on the PK (or even PD?) of the compound (i.e. concentration should not change by more than x%)?

❝ ... In the regression we assess the last three pre-dose concentrations, which – to some extent – takes the inter-occasion variability into account. Of course, we may fall into the trap mentioned previously.

I was thinking about the following: When we do a linear regression log(y) = a*x + b (+ eps), then the interpretation of a is that when x changes by 1 unit, then y changes (on average) by (exp(a) - 1) * 100%. That means we can make a statement about %-change in pre-dose concentration and we could maybe set relevance limits for this change. But the trap that you mentioned is I guess still valid and does not go away (we may argue not with the estimated coefficient of a but with some upper CI/PI limit (e.g. 68%), but nevertheless the issue remains).

❝ When we set a threshold of \(\small{x\%}\), we are essentially believing that the last two pre-dose concentrations are the true ones, right? Of course, that’s another trap.

Yes, agreed.

One more question: In your lecture you state that one should calculate gMean as well. Are you also calculating gMean ratios, i.e. calculating point estimates for the comparison of different time points (e.g. each vs. last)?

Best regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,761 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
8 visitors (0 registered, 8 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz