what about recyclers? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri  – Russia, 2021-10-04 16:22 (1300 d 16:52 ago) – Posting: # 22619
Views: 4,238

Dear Helmut,

❝ More details… The reference formulation in this study was terrible; CVwR twice of CVwT, many subjects with low AUCs after R. Since CVwT <30%, this was a HVDP and not a HVD. Adjusting the AUC would make things worse.


now try something with horrible enterohepatic cirulation ;-)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,667 registered users;
27 visitors (0 registered, 27 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:15 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is true that many scientists are not philosophically minded
and have hitherto shown much skill and ingenuity
but little wisdom.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5