what about recyclers? [NCA / SHAM]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2021-10-04 16:22 (1071 d 17:17 ago) – Posting: # 22619
Views: 3,095

Dear Helmut,

❝ More details… The reference formulation in this study was terrible; CVwR twice of CVwT, many subjects with low AUCs after R. Since CVwT <30%, this was a HVDP and not a HVD. Adjusting the AUC would make things worse.


now try something with horrible enterohepatic cirulation ;-)

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,222 posts in 4,877 threads, 1,656 registered users;
46 visitors (2 registered, 44 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:40 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Explanations exist; they have existed for all time;
there is always an easy solution to every human problem –
neat, plausible and wrong.    H. L. Mencken

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5