AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-02 10:55 (64 d 14:35 ago) – Posting: # 22614
Views: 772

Dear Helmut,

» Since both are lognormal, their ratio should be lognormal as well. I trust here Martin; will meet him in the evening and ask again.
» Furthermore, the distribution of values per se is not important, only the residual error.

Correct.

» One of my 4-period full replicate studies (143 subjects, Method A)
»

[image]



Looks not too bad for a log-normal ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,785 posts in 4,556 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 12 (1 registered, 11 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 00:31 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The history of statistics is like a telephone directory:
the plot is boring, full of numbers and the cast is endless.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5