AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]
Dear Helmut,
Correct.
Looks not too bad for a log-normal .
❝ Since both are lognormal, their ratio should be lognormal as well. I trust here Martin; will meet him in the evening and ask again.
❝ Furthermore, the distribution of values per se is not important, only the residual error.
Correct.
❝ One of my 4-period full replicate studies (143 subjects, Method A)
❝
Looks not too bad for a log-normal .
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- AUC · k for variable inter-occasion CL Helmut 2021-09-30 23:31 [NCA / SHAM]
- AUC · k for variable inter-occasion CL PharmCat 2021-10-01 00:15
- Changing the regulations: Hope dies last. Helmut 2021-10-01 11:18
- AUC * k d_labes 2021-10-01 13:52
- AUC * k Helmut 2021-10-01 17:01
- AUC * kd_labes 2021-10-02 10:55
- Ratio/product of two lognormals Helmut 2021-10-03 20:29
- Not for HVDPs? Helmut 2021-10-04 12:05
- what about recyclers? mittyri 2021-10-04 14:22
- Oh dear! Helmut 2021-10-04 16:10
- what about recyclers? mittyri 2021-10-04 14:22
- AUC * kd_labes 2021-10-02 10:55
- AUC * k Helmut 2021-10-01 17:01
- Changing the regulations: Hope dies last. PharmCat 2021-10-01 18:48
- AUC * k d_labes 2021-10-01 13:52
- Changing the regulations: Hope dies last. Helmut 2021-10-01 11:18
- AUC · k for variable inter-occasion CL PharmCat 2021-10-01 00:15