AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-02 10:55 (67 d 00:29 ago) – Posting: # 22614
Views: 781

Dear Helmut,

» Since both are lognormal, their ratio should be lognormal as well. I trust here Martin; will meet him in the evening and ask again.
» Furthermore, the distribution of values per se is not important, only the residual error.

Correct.

» One of my 4-period full replicate studies (143 subjects, Method A)
»

[image]



Looks not too bad for a log-normal ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,788 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 10:24 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There is no adequate defense, except stupidity,
against the impact of a new idea.    Percy Williams Bridgman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5