AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-02 10:55 (357 d 13:21 ago) – Posting: # 22614
Views: 1,313

Dear Helmut,

» Since both are lognormal, their ratio should be lognormal as well. I trust here Martin; will meet him in the evening and ask again.
» Furthermore, the distribution of values per se is not important, only the residual error.

Correct.

» One of my 4-period full replicate studies (143 subjects, Method A)
»

[image]



Looks not too bad for a log-normal ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,385 posts in 4,684 threads, 1,594 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 00:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You really don’t know what you don’t know until you write about it.
Then, everyone knows what you don’t know.    Rod Machado

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5