AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (965 d 13:35 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 2,621

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,035 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,645 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The mediocre teacher tells.
The good teacher explains.
The superior teacher demonstrates.
The great teacher inspires.    William Arthur Ward

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5