AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (616 d 13:39 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 1,708

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,627 posts in 4,743 threads, 1,613 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Learn the rules like a pro,
so you can break them like an artist.    attributed to Pablo Picasso

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5