AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 13:52 (65 d 10:46 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 867

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,785 posts in 4,556 threads, 1,547 registered users;
online 9 (0 registered, 9 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 23:39 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Every man is fully satisfied that there is such a thing as truth,
or he would not ask any question.    Charles Sanders Peirce

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5