AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]
Dear both,
what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?
what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?
—
Regards,
Detlew
Regards,
Detlew
Complete thread:
- AUC · k for variable inter-occasion CL Helmut 2021-09-30 23:31 [NCA / SHAM]
- AUC · k for variable inter-occasion CL PharmCat 2021-10-01 00:15
- Changing the regulations: Hope dies last. Helmut 2021-10-01 11:18
- AUC * kd_labes 2021-10-01 13:52
- AUC * k Helmut 2021-10-01 17:01
- AUC * k d_labes 2021-10-02 10:55
- Ratio/product of two lognormals Helmut 2021-10-03 20:29
- Not for HVDPs? Helmut 2021-10-04 12:05
- what about recyclers? mittyri 2021-10-04 14:22
- Oh dear! Helmut 2021-10-04 16:10
- what about recyclers? mittyri 2021-10-04 14:22
- AUC * k d_labes 2021-10-02 10:55
- AUC * k Helmut 2021-10-01 17:01
- Changing the regulations: Hope dies last. PharmCat 2021-10-01 18:48
- AUC * kd_labes 2021-10-01 13:52
- Changing the regulations: Hope dies last. Helmut 2021-10-01 11:18
- AUC · k for variable inter-occasion CL PharmCat 2021-10-01 00:15