AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (1326 d 08:09 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 4,604

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,682 registered users;
110 visitors (0 registered, 110 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself,
but talent instantly recognizes genius.    Arthur Conan Doyle

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5