AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 13:52 (232 d 17:27 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 1,195

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 07:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5