AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 13:52 (22 d 16:10 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 552

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,753 posts in 4,548 threads, 1,544 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 06:03 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

They were “so intent of making everything numerical”
that they frequently missed seeing
what was there to be seen.    Barbara McClintock

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5