AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (1356 d 10:23 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 5,415

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
77 visitors (0 registered, 77 guests [including 57 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Philosophy, like medicine, has plenty of drugs, few good remedies,
and hardly any specific cures.    Sebastien-Roch Nicolas de Chamfort

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5