AUC * k [NCA / SHAM]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2021-10-01 15:52 (879 d 13:55 ago) – Posting: # 22611
Views: 2,219

Dear both,

what do you think is a reasonable assumption about the distribution of the metric AUC*k?
Do we have to throw away our evaluation of BE studies assuming log-normal distri of the metrics AUC and/or Cmax?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,636 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:48 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Exploratory analysis: The art of finding a Rembrandt
in a Jackson Pollock.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5