Increased variability [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-09-17 16:51 (79 d 07:22 ago) – Posting: # 22586
Views: 1,322

Hi all,

» » The CVs calculated from the confidence intervals in both ‘parts’ are much lower than the ones in the ‘full’ study. Or the other way ’round: If we pool the CVs of the ‘parts’ we could expect values which are lower than the ‘observed’ (tee-hee!) ones.

Correctly observed. And for exactly those reasons it makes very good sense to plot for example the RMSE, CV, SE of diff., or even the width of the CI as function of (cumulated) number of subjects.

It is not so difficult. :-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,786 posts in 4,557 threads, 1,548 registered users;
online 8 (1 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 00:13 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

The history of statistics is like a telephone directory:
the plot is boring, full of numbers and the cast is endless.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5