Increased variability [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-09-17 18:51 (281 d 10:06 ago) – Posting: # 22586
Views: 3,061

Hi all,

» » The CVs calculated from the confidence intervals in both ‘parts’ are much lower than the ones in the ‘full’ study. Or the other way ’round: If we pool the CVs of the ‘parts’ we could expect values which are lower than the ‘observed’ (tee-hee!) ones.

Correctly observed. And for exactly those reasons it makes very good sense to plot for example the RMSE, CV, SE of diff., or even the width of the CI as function of (cumulated) number of subjects.

It is not so difficult. :-)

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,167 posts in 4,645 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 04:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The person interested in success has to learn
to view failure as a healthy, inevitable part
of the process of getting to the top.    Joyce Brothers

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz