Increased variability [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2021-09-17 19:56 (1721 d 02:46 ago) – Posting: # 22585
Views: 21,513

Hi Helmut,

❝ The CVs calculated from the confidence intervals in both ‘parts’ are much lower than the ones in the ‘full’ study. Or the other way ’round: If we pool the CVs of the ‘parts’ we could expect values which are lower than the ‘observed’ (tee-hee!) ones.


Yep. The effect on the MSE is clearly visible on Figure 4 of the paper linked by ElMaestro.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,653 posts in 4,991 threads, 1,570 registered users;
437 visitors (0 registered, 437 guests [including 31 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I’m all in favor of the democratic principle
that one idiot is as good as one genius, but I draw the line
when someone takes the next step and concludes
that two idiots are better than one genius.    Leo Szilard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5