Increased variability [GxP / QC / QA]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2021-09-17 17:56 (251 d 19:51 ago) – Posting: # 22585
Views: 2,455

Hi Helmut,

» The CVs calculated from the confidence intervals in both ‘parts’ are much lower than the ones in the ‘full’ study. Or the other way ’round: If we pool the CVs of the ‘parts’ we could expect values which are lower than the ‘observed’ (tee-hee!) ones.

Yep. The effect on the MSE is clearly visible on Figure 4 of the paper linked by ElMaestro.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,108 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 15 (1 registered, 14 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 13:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5