Suffering from Human Unintelligence [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-08-27 20:47 (1340 d 00:38 ago) – Posting: # 22551
Views: 3,000

Hi Achievwin,

❝ Question for veterans


Do my 40 years in BE qualify?

❝ Does anyone share their experiences of applying Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning and Machine learning concepts in Bioavaialability and Bioequivalence programs.


Sorry, never heard that anyone tried that. I don’t see that it’s necessary. For the majority of studies even paper/pencil/brain is sufficient in principle.
Too many studies fail by design (see this post and followings). Honestly, as long as we are suffering from Human Unintelligence, AI can’t help.

[image] Perhaps later… SCNR

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,673 registered users;
96 visitors (0 registered, 96 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5