Results Analysis [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Achievwin – US, 2021-08-17 21:26 (472 d 03:40 ago) – Posting: # 22524
Views: 1,898

❝ 90% CI AUC: Lower limit - 98.35, Upper limit - 132.50, T/R ratio of AUC: 112.2

❝ 90% CI Cmax: Lower limit - 95.38, Upper limit - 127.80, T/R ratio of Cmax: 109.5


❝ Questions:

❝ 1. Primary reason for BE Failure?


Looking at your confidence intervals it looks like your ISCV computation may not be accurate, I am getting 33.6 for AUC. Your study is under powered!!!!!.

Assuming high bound of 34% ISCV and Ratio of 112 you 136 subjects (completers) for a standard 2x2 study design.

To improve probability of success go for 3-way (if your RLD CV is tight) or 4-way cross over replicated design with RSABE option. You have a shot at satisfying Bioequivalence.

Hope this helps

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,425 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,600 registered users;
12 visitors (1 registered, 11 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:07 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5