Results Analysis [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Achievwin – US, 2021-08-17 21:26 (845 d 10:36 ago) – Posting: # 22524
Views: 2,460

❝ 90% CI AUC: Lower limit - 98.35, Upper limit - 132.50, T/R ratio of AUC: 112.2

❝ 90% CI Cmax: Lower limit - 95.38, Upper limit - 127.80, T/R ratio of Cmax: 109.5

❝ Questions:

❝ 1. Primary reason for BE Failure?

Looking at your confidence intervals it looks like your ISCV computation may not be accurate, I am getting 33.6 for AUC. Your study is under powered!!!!!.

Assuming high bound of 34% ISCV and Ratio of 112 you 136 subjects (completers) for a standard 2x2 study design.

To improve probability of success go for 3-way (if your RLD CV is tight) or 4-way cross over replicated design with RSABE option. You have a shot at satisfying Bioequivalence.

Hope this helps

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,823 posts in 4,786 threads, 1,632 registered users;
26 visitors (0 registered, 26 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:02 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz