Different products → different BA [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-08-17 15:36 (366 d 07:21 ago) – Posting: # 22523
Views: 1,271

Hi Mehul,

» » I guess you had also the same batch of the test? Was the AUC different as well?
»
» Both the tests were different but Reference were same. AUC of Reference was similar for both the studies, only Cmax varied by 22%.

OK, that’s another cup of tea. If you had different test products (not batches of the same one) in the studies, it’s not uncommon they differ. Were these modified release products? For them similar AUC and different Cmax is much more common than for IR products.

» What may be the reasons for this?

Different products, different bioavailability… Business as usual.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 22:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

On two occasions I have been asked,—“Pray, Mr. Babbage,
if you put into the machine wrong figures,…
will the right answers come out?”
 …
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question.    Charles Babbage

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5