“Fixed Effects, Rather Than Random Effects…” [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-08-04 08:18 (84 d 13:24 ago) – Posting: # 22502
Views: 1,697

Hi all,

[image] here's a paper that discusses the funky issue with fixed effects versus random effects.

In particular, who can come up with a quantitative relevant measure of the difference any estimator makes if you have two model alternatives?

One thing is of course to judge if estimate A is closer to the true value that estimator B, or if its variance is smaller, but another is to judge practical relevance. I was told that it is the latter that is of interest to the author. :-D

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,759 posts in 4,550 threads, 1,545 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There ain’t no rules around here!
We’re trying to accomplish something!    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz