“Fixed Effects, Rather Than Random Effects…” [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi all,
here's a paper that discusses the funky issue with fixed effects versus random effects.
Enjoy.
In particular, who can come up with a quantitative relevant measure of the difference any estimator makes if you have two model alternatives?
One thing is of course to judge if estimate A is closer to the true value that estimator B, or if its variance is smaller, but another is to judge practical relevance. I was told that it is the latter that is of interest to the author.
here's a paper that discusses the funky issue with fixed effects versus random effects.
Enjoy.
In particular, who can come up with a quantitative relevant measure of the difference any estimator makes if you have two model alternatives?
One thing is of course to judge if estimate A is closer to the true value that estimator B, or if its variance is smaller, but another is to judge practical relevance. I was told that it is the latter that is of interest to the author.
—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro
Complete thread:
- “Fixed Effects, Rather Than Random Effects…”ElMaestro 2021-08-04 08:18 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Very nice! Helmut 2021-08-04 10:16
- Very nice! ElMaestro 2021-08-04 12:51
- Narrower CI with LM? Helmut 2021-08-04 15:22
- Very nice! ElMaestro 2021-08-04 12:51
- Very nice! Helmut 2021-08-04 10:16