“Fixed Effects, Rather Than Random Effects…” [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-08-04 10:18 (1190 d 15:22 ago) – Posting: # 22502
Views: 4,007

Hi all,

[image] here's a paper that discusses the funky issue with fixed effects versus random effects.

Enjoy.
In particular, who can come up with a quantitative relevant measure of the difference any estimator makes if you have two model alternatives?

One thing is of course to judge if estimate A is closer to the true value that estimator B, or if its variance is smaller, but another is to judge practical relevance. I was told that it is the latter that is of interest to the author. :-D

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,288 posts in 4,890 threads, 1,659 registered users;
83 visitors (0 registered, 83 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 00:40 CET (Europe/Vienna)

‘Normal science’ means research firmly based upon one or more
past scientific achievements, achievements that some particular
scientific community acknowledges for a time as supplying
the foundation for its further practice.    Thomas S. Kuhn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5