“Fixed Effects, Rather Than Random Effects…” [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2021-08-04 10:18 (858 d 20:42 ago) – Posting: # 22502
Views: 2,902

Hi all,

[image] here's a paper that discusses the funky issue with fixed effects versus random effects.

In particular, who can come up with a quantitative relevant measure of the difference any estimator makes if you have two model alternatives?

One thing is of course to judge if estimate A is closer to the true value that estimator B, or if its variance is smaller, but another is to judge practical relevance. I was told that it is the latter that is of interest to the author. :-D

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,823 posts in 4,786 threads, 1,633 registered users;
35 visitors (0 registered, 35 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:01 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz