partial AUCs in SD [NCA / SHAM]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-08-02 14:05 (381 d 07:54 ago) – Posting: # 22497
Views: 1,487

Hi Vishal,

» as per your suggestion the partial AUCs will be AUC(0-12 hrs) & AUC12-24 hrs (Considering dosing interval of 24 hrs)

Yep. See my reply to Relaxation’s post.

» what happen if we select partial AUCs ie AUC(0-12 hrs) & AUC12-72 hrs (Considering last sample collection time point ie 72 hrs) & prove the bioequivalence is this accepted by regulatory?

I’m not an assessor. :-D
If you have no missings, a sufficient LLOQ (all late concentrations measurable), and if the assessor is a ‘tick-the-box type’ (since \(\small{_\textrm{partial}AUC_{\textrm{cut off}-t_\textrm{last}}}\) is stated in the GL), all is good.
However, from a PK perspective (‼) it doesn’t make sense.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 22:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

On two occasions I have been asked,—“Pray, Mr. Babbage,
if you put into the machine wrong figures,…
will the right answers come out?”
 …
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question.    Charles Babbage

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5