Two Stage Design [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear Ravi,
I would go with ‘Method C’ suggested by Potvin et al. (2007).* The design was validated in 1,000,000 simulated BE studies in numerous combinations of sample sizes (12–60 subjects in stage 1) and CVs (10–100%).
The α-level (patient’s risk) was maintained at ≤0.052 - which is not the case by methods currently applied in Canada and Japan (evaluation of stage 1 at α=0.05, simple pooling of a second stage; results presented in the reference as ‘Method A’).
Below an outline of the procedure:
![[image]](img/uploaded/image4.png)
For your example you have two possibilities to show BE already in stage 1:
Edit: Our first study with this design was approved by one of Berlin’s IECs and the German BfArM in May 2009.
I would go with ‘Method C’ suggested by Potvin et al. (2007).* The design was validated in 1,000,000 simulated BE studies in numerous combinations of sample sizes (12–60 subjects in stage 1) and CVs (10–100%).
The α-level (patient’s risk) was maintained at ≤0.052 - which is not the case by methods currently applied in Canada and Japan (evaluation of stage 1 at α=0.05, simple pooling of a second stage; results presented in the reference as ‘Method A’).
Below an outline of the procedure:
![[image]](img/uploaded/image4.png)
For your example you have two possibilities to show BE already in stage 1:
- Power ≥80%: evaluation at α=0.0500
- Power <80%: evaluation at α=0.0294
- Potvin D, Diliberti CE, Hauck WW, Parr AF, Schuirmann DJ, and RA Smith
Sequential design approaches for bioequivalence studies with crossover designs
Pharmaceut Statist (pre-print 2007), DOI: 10.1002/pst.294
Online abstract
Edit: Our first study with this design was approved by one of Berlin’s IECs and the German BfArM in May 2009.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/pics/Blue_and_yellow_ribbon_UA.png)
Helmut Schütz
![[image]](https://static.bebac.at/img/CC by.png)
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-22 14:30 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-22 15:42
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-23 02:02
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 09:14
- Variations Helmut 2008-08-25 11:06
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 09:14
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-23 02:02
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Jaime_R 2008-08-23 16:47
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Ravi 2008-08-25 08:19
- Two Stage DesignHelmut 2008-08-25 11:43
- Two Stage Design JPL 2008-08-28 09:44
- Two Stage Design Helmut 2008-08-28 11:50
- Two Stage Design d_labes 2008-08-28 12:09
- Sequential Design Helmut 2008-11-05 13:22
- Two Stage Design Helmut 2008-08-28 11:50
- Two Stage Design JPL 2008-08-28 09:44
- Two Stage DesignHelmut 2008-08-25 11:43
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) banusunman 2008-08-26 16:56
- Washout Helmut 2008-10-15 16:02
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Ravi 2008-08-25 08:19
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 09:49
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-25 12:11
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 13:03
- Urban legend? Helmut 2008-11-21 16:06
- Urban legend? d_labes 2008-11-24 15:06
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) Helmut 2008-08-25 12:11
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-25 11:16
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1), tmax, MRT, LZ d_labes 2008-08-25 11:32
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1), tmax, MRT, LZ Helmut 2008-08-25 13:10
- tmax, nonparametrics Helmut 2008-10-13 15:38
- tmax, nonparametrics d_labes 2008-10-14 08:33
- tmax, nonparametrics Helmut 2008-10-14 11:29
- tmax, Canadian approach Helmut 2008-11-21 15:41
- tmax, Canadian approach d_labes 2008-11-24 13:53
- Early exposure, Canadian approach: GMR only! Helmut 2009-02-08 00:44
- Early exposure, Canadian approach: GMR only! d_labes 2009-02-09 08:50
- Early exposure, Canadian approach: GMR only! Helmut 2009-02-08 00:44
- tmax; another example Helmut 2008-12-25 15:59
- tmax, Canadian approach d_labes 2008-11-24 13:53
- tmax, nonparametrics d_labes 2008-10-14 08:33
- Automatic integration janmacek 2008-08-27 12:21
- Automatic integration Ohlbe 2008-08-27 14:49
- Manual reintegration! H_Rotter 2008-08-28 11:28
- Manual reintegration! ElMaestro 2008-08-28 12:44
- Manual reintegration! H_Rotter 2008-08-28 11:28
- Automatic integration Ohlbe 2008-08-27 14:49
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent d_labes 2008-09-02 11:13
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent Ohlbe 2008-09-02 15:20
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent d_labes 2008-09-02 16:30
- Subject accountability, Proc MIXED or equivalent Ohlbe 2008-09-02 15:20
- partial AUC, early exposure d_labes 2008-09-03 08:35
- HVDs? Helmut 2008-09-23 12:52
- HVDs? d_labes 2008-09-23 14:20
- HVDs? Helmut 2009-01-20 14:33
- E.g., omeprazole Helmut 2009-03-06 17:21
- BCS-based Biowaiver Helmut 2008-09-25 15:48
- Dissolution update Helmut 2008-10-13 12:43
- EUFEPS workshop Helmut 2008-12-23 17:03
- Critical review of EU BE guideline (Rev.1) d_labes 2008-08-22 15:42