Hypotheses [Outliers]

posted by Loky do – Egypt, 2021-07-06 11:51 (448 d 11:51 ago) – Posting: # 22458
Views: 1,380

Thanks, Helmut for your reply

but I am quite confused, some products show high intrasubject variability more than anticipated or published in the literature and I think this variability affect the reliability of results, for example, I have a BE study for (lansoprazole), partially replicate design, the published intrasubject variability ~ 40% but the practical intrasubject variability we had was near 85% :confused: study protocol also stated using ema guidelines for scaling but the study failed, when I used FDA method it passes :confused: does this high variability have a role in this confusing results? also in the future protocol can I specify that if the intrasubject variability is more than 50% can I switch to the FDA method for calculation, as many authorities we submit our studies to follow ema guidelines?

Thanks in advance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,391 posts in 4,685 threads, 1,595 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 23:42 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics. A sort of elementary form of mathematics which consists of
adding things together and occasionally squaring them.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5