Hypotheses [Outliers]

posted by Loky do – Egypt, 2021-07-06 13:51 (1103 d 04:55 ago) – Posting: # 22458
Views: 4,293

Thanks, Helmut for your reply

but I am quite confused, some products show high intrasubject variability more than anticipated or published in the literature and I think this variability affect the reliability of results, for example, I have a BE study for (lansoprazole), partially replicate design, the published intrasubject variability ~ 40% but the practical intrasubject variability we had was near 85% :confused: study protocol also stated using ema guidelines for scaling but the study failed, when I used FDA method it passes :confused: does this high variability have a role in this confusing results? also in the future protocol can I specify that if the intrasubject variability is more than 50% can I switch to the FDA method for calculation, as many authorities we submit our studies to follow ema guidelines?

Thanks in advance

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,099 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,646 registered users;
84 visitors (0 registered, 84 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:46 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded
if you tied them the usual way.
This happens to us all the time with computers,
and nobody thinks of complaining.    Jef Raskin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5