Failed study [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-04-27 02:28 (1030 d 01:19 ago) – Posting: # 22327
Views: 2,362

Dear Ohlbe,

❝ NK's study is intended for the US FDA, I don't know how these guys react to such exclusions.


IMHO, that would by a case for R-t-R, Section VI.A. because nothing about excluding ‘outliers’ is stated in any of the product-specific recommendations I’m aware of. That’s why I suggested a controlled correspondence for the next study to hope for Section VI.B.

❝ In Europe, subject B could be excluded according to the EU BE guideline, but subject A could not as the period with all BLQ was after the test product. EU regulators will tell you that this might be due to your product and you can't exclude the data just because they don't suit you. In such a situation: you're screwed.


Correct.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,899 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,651 registered users;
23 visitors (0 registered, 23 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:48 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is, or should be, about scientific investigation
and how to do it better, but many statisticians believe
it is a branch of mathematics.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5