Failed study [Study Assessment]
Dear Ohlbe,
IMHO, that would by a case for R-t-R, Section VI.A. because nothing about excluding ‘outliers’ is stated in any of the product-specific recommendations I’m aware of. That’s why I suggested a controlled correspondence for the next study to hope for Section VI.B.
Correct.
❝ NK's study is intended for the US FDA, I don't know how these guys react to such exclusions.
IMHO, that would by a case for R-t-R, Section VI.A. because nothing about excluding ‘outliers’ is stated in any of the product-specific recommendations I’m aware of. That’s why I suggested a controlled correspondence for the next study to hope for Section VI.B.
❝ In Europe, subject B could be excluded according to the EU BE guideline, but subject A could not as the period with all BLQ was after the test product. EU regulators will tell you that this might be due to your product and you can't exclude the data just because they don't suit you. In such a situation: you're screwed.
Correct.
—
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна!
Helmut Schütz
The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes
Complete thread:
- Fully Replicate Study NK 2021-04-26 09:46 [Study Assessment]
- Outliers in study intended for RSABE Helmut 2021-04-26 12:24
- Outliers in study intended for RSABE Ohlbe 2021-04-26 18:30
- failed study? mittyri 2021-04-26 19:01
- Failed study Helmut 2021-04-27 00:33
- Failed studyHelmut 2021-04-27 00:28
- failed study? mittyri 2021-04-26 19:01
- Outliers in study intended for RSABE Ohlbe 2021-04-26 18:30
- Outliers in study intended for RSABE Helmut 2021-04-26 12:24