Suggestions [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-04-23 12:34 (644 d 00:30 ago) – Posting: # 22316
Views: 1,378

Hi PVRC,

❝ If the AUC0-t is not affected by the missing sample in the elimination phase can the data from such a subject be considered for analysis..?


What does your protocol say? It boils down how long you sampled. See also this article, esp. the section about Missings.

With a half life of 12 hours and the last sample at 8 hours in the first period, a comparison of AUC0–t will be biased. Essentially you have two options:
  1. Compare in this subject AUC0–8 (see also this post).
  2. Exclude the subject from the comparison of AUC but keep him/her for the comparison of Cmax. Since commonly studies are powered for Cmax with its higher variability, the impact on power of AUC is a minor one.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,477 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,603 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:05 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5