Suggestions [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-04-23 12:34 (1126 d 17:20 ago) – Posting: # 22316
Views: 2,294

Hi PVRC,

❝ If the AUC0-t is not affected by the missing sample in the elimination phase can the data from such a subject be considered for analysis..?


What does your protocol say? It boils down how long you sampled. See also this article, esp. the section about Missings.

With a half life of 12 hours and the last sample at 8 hours in the first period, a comparison of AUC0–t will be biased. Essentially you have two options:
  1. Compare in this subject AUC0–8 (see also this post).
  2. Exclude the subject from the comparison of AUC but keep him/her for the comparison of Cmax. Since commonly studies are powered for Cmax with its higher variability, the impact on power of AUC is a minor one.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,035 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,645 registered users;
45 visitors (0 registered, 45 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The mediocre teacher tells.
The good teacher explains.
The superior teacher demonstrates.
The great teacher inspires.    William Arthur Ward

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5