RSABE… [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-02-24 16:47 (1153 d 22:49 ago) – Posting: # 22231
Views: 2,696

Hi Loky do,

❝ I didn't find this statement in FDA guidance for bioequivalence studies …


RSABE appears in the ANDA draft guidance of December 2013 (footnote 10 on page 4 = page 8 of the PDF).
Don’t waste your money and get the book mentioned there – the chapter is not helpful. Get the paper by Davit et al.* instead. Free and better.

❝ … just in progesterone guidance so, is it enough to refer to this guide while submitting the st udy to regulatory (as the intrasubject variability CV% equal 57%, partially replicate design), or is there another guide would support this way?


Any one would do, IMHO.



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,991 posts in 4,827 threads, 1,647 registered users;
46 visitors (1 registered, 45 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you don’t like something change it;
if you can’t change it, change the way you think about it.    Mary Engelbreit

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5