RSABE… [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-02-24 16:47 (1149 d 22:36 ago) – Posting: # 22231
Views: 2,681

Hi Loky do,

❝ I didn't find this statement in FDA guidance for bioequivalence studies …


RSABE appears in the ANDA draft guidance of December 2013 (footnote 10 on page 4 = page 8 of the PDF).
Don’t waste your money and get the book mentioned there – the chapter is not helpful. Get the paper by Davit et al.* instead. Free and better.

❝ … just in progesterone guidance so, is it enough to refer to this guide while submitting the st udy to regulatory (as the intrasubject variability CV% equal 57%, partially replicate design), or is there another guide would support this way?


Any one would do, IMHO.



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,987 posts in 4,824 threads, 1,665 registered users;
91 visitors (0 registered, 91 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:23 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5