RSABE… [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-02-24 14:46 (451 d 17:46 ago) – Posting: # 22228
Views: 1,896

Hi Loky do,

» Regarding AUC widening, is it applicable in both partially and fully replicate designs …

If the main condition for RSABE is fulfilled (high variabilty), yes. Contrary to jurisdictions applying ABEL, a clinical justification and assessment of ‘outliers’ is not required.
In RSABE you don’t ‘widen’ the limits. That’s a simplification. For the background see this post and the guidance you mentioned.

» … or fully replicate design only as FDA referred to the published book chapter for RSABE

Which book are you referring to?

» So could we apply it in general or it’s not applicable?

For the FDA you can apply RSABE for any PK metric (AUCs, partial AUCs, Cmax, :blahblah:) if its \(\small{s_{\textrm{wR}}\geq 0.294\;(CV_{\textrm{wR}}\geq\approx0.300469\ldots)}\)
If \(\small{s_{\textrm{wR}}<0.294}\) you have to evaluate the respective PK metric for ABE.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 09:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Competence, like truth, beauty and contact lenses,
is in the eye of the beholder.    Laurence J. Peter

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5