RSABE… [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-02-24 15:46 (1091 d 10:50 ago) – Posting: # 22228
Views: 2,579

Hi Loky do,

❝ Regarding AUC widening, is it applicable in both partially and fully replicate designs …


If the main condition for RSABE is fulfilled (high variabilty), yes. Contrary to jurisdictions applying ABEL, a clinical justification and assessment of ‘outliers’ is not required.
In RSABE you don’t ‘widen’ the limits. That’s a simplification. For the background see this post and the guidance you mentioned.

❝ … or fully replicate design only as FDA referred to the published book chapter for RSABE


Which book are you referring to?

❝ So could we apply it in general or it’s not applicable?


For the FDA you can apply RSABE for any PK metric (AUCs, partial AUCs, Cmax, :blahblah:) if its \(\small{s_{\textrm{wR}}\geq 0.294\;(CV_{\textrm{wR}}\geq\approx0.300469\ldots)}\)
If \(\small{s_{\textrm{wR}}<0.294}\) you have to evaluate the respective PK metric for ABE.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,899 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,651 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 02:36 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is, or should be, about scientific investigation
and how to do it better, but many statisticians believe
it is a branch of mathematics.    George E.P. Box

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5