505(j) = ANDA, 505(b)(2) NDA = ‘hybrid’ [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2021-01-21 13:37 (40 d 09:53 ago) – Posting: # 22187
Views: 355

Hi Brus,

» We are developing a generic of an RLD with two strengths (100 mg and 50 mg).
» But viewing the dosage regimen of reference drug product, it would make sense to develop a 150 mg strength even though the reference product does not have it. So, our generic drug product will have 3 strengths (150, 100 and 50 mg).
» PK linearity has been demonstrated in the range of that doses.

So far so good. Since you are mentioning RLD you are targeting the FDA, right?
Is a single (not daily) 150 mg dose approved?

» Should RLD 100mg VS Generic 100mg be done …

Yes. If a proportionality biowaiver (in vitro similarity) of the 50 mg strength works, fine. Check the product-specific guidance for the recommended conditions. If that fails, you need to perform a biostudy of the 50 mg strength as well.

» … or RLD 100mg + RLD 50mg VS generic 150mg?

For the FDA that’s an 505(b)(2) NDA (the guidance is quite old and not very specific); you can’t get an approval of the 150 mg via an ANDA since it not a generic (no 150 mg RLD). The study 150 mg (T) vs. 100 mg (RLD) + 50 mg (RLD) is just part of the story.
In Europe that’s the hybrid pathway. Additionally to this study generally clinical studies are required as well.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,359 posts in 4,460 threads, 1,492 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 23:31 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

The art and science of asking questions
is the source of all knowledge.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz