Different sampling time points and Blinding [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-12-11 11:38 (837 d 04:07 ago) – Posting: # 22141
Views: 1,608

Hi Pharma_88,

❝ Analyst is always blind …


Analytics would be a tough job for a blind analyst. :blind:
You mean blinded for treatment.

❝ By keeping different sampling time points i.e. 20 time-points for test and 22 time points for reference, whether analyst will blind in this condition?


Of course, not (assuming that he/she is not stupid). Sometimes you aim at different sampling times (say when comparing MR to IR, DR to IR, IR to IV or an solution) in order to have an optimal schedule describing the profiles.
Keep the number of time points equal and give the sequence of samples (1, 2, …, n) and not the time points themselves (t1, t2, …, tn) on the vials’ label.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,557 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,607 registered users;
21 visitors (0 registered, 21 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Science is wonderfully equipped to answer the question “How?”
but it gets terribly confused when you ask the question “Why?”    Erwin Chargaff

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5