Different sampling time points and Blinding [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-12-11 11:38 (1263 d 08:02 ago) – Posting: # 22141
Views: 2,053

Hi Pharma_88,

❝ Analyst is always blind …


Analytics would be a tough job for a blind analyst. :blind:
You mean blinded for treatment.

❝ By keeping different sampling time points i.e. 20 time-points for test and 22 time points for reference, whether analyst will blind in this condition?


Of course, not (assuming that he/she is not stupid). Sometimes you aim at different sampling times (say when comparing MR to IR, DR to IR, IR to IV or an solution) in order to have an optimal schedule describing the profiles.
Keep the number of time points equal and give the sequence of samples (1, 2, …, n) and not the time points themselves (t1, t2, …, tn) on the vials’ label.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,035 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,645 registered users;
65 visitors (0 registered, 65 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 20:41 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

That which is static and repetitive is boring.
That which is dynamic and random is confusing.
In between lies art.    John Locke

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5