Different sampling time points and Blinding [Bioanalytics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-12-11 11:38 (721 d 11:33 ago) – Posting: # 22141
Views: 1,518

Hi Pharma_88,

❝ Analyst is always blind …


Analytics would be a tough job for a blind analyst. :blind:
You mean blinded for treatment.

❝ By keeping different sampling time points i.e. 20 time-points for test and 22 time points for reference, whether analyst will blind in this condition?


Of course, not (assuming that he/she is not stupid). Sometimes you aim at different sampling times (say when comparing MR to IR, DR to IR, IR to IV or an solution) in order to have an optimal schedule describing the profiles.
Keep the number of time points equal and give the sequence of samples (1, 2, …, n) and not the time points themselves (t1, t2, …, tn) on the vials’ label.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,423 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,600 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:12 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5