From bad to worse [Software]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2020-12-11 00:22 (192 d 20:26 ago) – Posting: # 22136
Views: 2,943

Dear Ohlbe,

» If I get -2,77556E-17 when I type =(0.5-0.4-0.1), how comes that I get 0 when I type =(-0.1-0.4+0.5) ? The same figures, just in a different order ?

The order matters when you go to floating point arithmetic;-)


» If I get FALSE when I type =0=0.5-0.4-0.1, how comes that I get TRUE when I type =0=-0.4-0.1+0.5 ?

Rightyright. Why did it happen? The root cause is described here
Excel does do some additional operations under the hood.

» And to be fair to Excel, the same happens in [image]:
»
»

0==(0.5-0.4-0.1)
» [1] FALSE
» 0==(-0.4-0.1+0.5)
» [1] TRUE


» Are they first calculating -0.4-0.1=-0.5, which is nicely binarily coded, then -0.5+0.5=0 ?

Yes, take a look at this MS article
Both Excel and R are following IEEE 754, not surprising that the conditions are giving the same results. The problem is only in values representation to the user.

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,530 posts in 4,499 threads, 1,524 registered users;
online 19 (0 registered, 19 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 21:48 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Young man, in mathematics you don’t understand things.
You just get used to them.    John von Neumann

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5