Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • WHO lamenting about terminology?

WHO lamenting about terminology? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro – Denmark, 2020-12-07 14:54 (133 d 02:01 ago) – Posting: # 22123
Views: 1,094

Will they be cracking down on spelling errors too, you think? :-)

:-)

—
Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reports Ohlbe 2020-12-04 12:04 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reports ElMaestro 2020-12-04 14:10
  - CI inclusion ≠ TOST Helmut 2020-12-04 20:30
    - CI inclusion ≠ TOST d_labes 2020-12-05 16:19
      - CI inclusion ≠ TOST ElMaestro 2020-12-05 16:49
        
        CI inclusion ≠ TOST d_labes 2020-12-07 11:39
      - CI inclusion ≠ TOST Helmut 2020-12-06 22:09
        
        CI inclusion operationally identical to TOST d_labes 2020-12-07 11:11
        
        WHO lamenting about terminology? Helmut 2020-12-07 13:02
        
        WHO lamenting about terminology?ElMaestro 2020-12-07 14:54
        WHO lamenting about terminology? d_labes 2020-12-07 15:35
- WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reports Helmut 2020-12-22 19:00
  - "obtain balanced groups" vs randomisation ElMaestro 2020-12-23 08:12

Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 20 (0 registered, 20 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 17:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is one certainty in drug development
and statistics that one can depend on:
the data are always late. Scott Patterson and Byron Jones

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz