CI inclusion ≠ TOST [BE/BA News]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-12-07 12:39 (1427 d 18:17 ago) – Posting: # 22121
Views: 5,041

Dear ElMaestro,

❝ If I am getting it right this isn't about whether your product passes the test for BE or not, it is purely a matter relating to what you call it. Since semantics is now of such importance, I believe PowerTOST needs to be renamed.:cool:


Can't understand what the Dichter damit sagen will ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,280 posts in 4,889 threads, 1,655 registered users;
116 visitors (0 registered, 116 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:57 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There is one certainty in drug development
and statistics that one can depend on:
the data are always late.    Scott Patterson and Byron Jones

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5