CI inclusion ≠ TOST [BE/BA News]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-12-07 11:39 (536 d 02:00 ago) – Posting: # 22121
Views: 2,561

Dear ElMaestro,

» If I am getting it right this isn't about whether your product passes the test for BE or not, it is purely a matter relating to what you call it. Since semantics is now of such importance, I believe PowerTOST needs to be renamed.:cool:

Can't understand what the Dichter damit sagen will ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,108 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 14:39 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We absolutely must leave room for doubt
or there is no progress and no learning.
There is no learning without having to pose a question.
And a question requires doubt.
People search for certainty.
But there is no certainty.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5