CI inclusion ≠ TOST [BE/BA News]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-12-07 12:39 (1655 d 16:58 ago) – Posting: # 22121
Views: 7,029

Dear ElMaestro,

❝ If I am getting it right this isn't about whether your product passes the test for BE or not, it is purely a matter relating to what you call it. Since semantics is now of such importance, I believe PowerTOST needs to be renamed.:cool:


Can't understand what the Dichter damit sagen will ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,676 registered users;
47 visitors (0 registered, 47 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5