CI inclusion ≠ TOST [BE/BA News]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-12-07 12:39 (1026 d 05:41 ago) – Posting: # 22121
Views: 3,420

Dear ElMaestro,

❝ If I am getting it right this isn't about whether your product passes the test for BE or not, it is purely a matter relating to what you call it. Since semantics is now of such importance, I believe PowerTOST needs to be renamed.:cool:


Can't understand what the Dichter damit sagen will ;-).

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,763 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,627 registered users;
21 visitors (0 registered, 21 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A little Learning is a dang’rous Thing;
Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian Spring:
There shallow Draughts intoxicate the Brain,
And drinking largely sobers us again.    Alexander Pope

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5