## CI inclusion ≠ TOST [BE/BA News]

Haha,

❝ if the CI inclusion rule is really something different than TOST why do we calculate power / samplesize based on TOST .

d_labes, you beat me to it, I was going to ask a similar question.

If I am getting it right this isn't about whether your product passes the test for BE or not, it is purely a matter relating to what you call it. Since semantics is now of such importance, I believe PowerTOST needs to be renamed.

Now someone kindly define robust and robustness for me so that I understand it. And please tell me how to use that definition to make a simulation robust enough that it convinces WHO
Or more generally, if I want to present an argument to a WHO regulator (not a simulation but just an argument which may or may not be based on siumulation) in which way will I know away to make my argument robust?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro