Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reports [BE/BA News]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2020-12-04 13:04 (1232 d 04:27 ago) – Posting: # 22112
Views: 4,634

Dear all,

The WHO has published a 7-page document listing frequent deficiencies in BE protocols, reports and practices.

Helmut will be happy with at least one recommendation: no need to calculate and report post-hoc power. I expect some others to stir some discussions here (e.g. 2-stage design)

Complete thread:

• WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reportsOhlbe 2020-12-04 12:04 [BE/BA News] 
  • WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reports ElMaestro 2020-12-04 14:10
    • CI inclusion ≠ TOST Helmut 2020-12-04 20:30
      • CI inclusion ≠ TOST d_labes 2020-12-05 16:19
        • CI inclusion ≠ TOST ElMaestro 2020-12-05 16:49
          • CI inclusion ≠ TOST d_labes 2020-12-07 11:39
        • CI inclusion ≠ TOST Helmut 2020-12-06 22:09
          • CI inclusion operationally identical to TOST d_labes 2020-12-07 11:11
            • WHO lamenting about terminology? Helmut 2020-12-07 13:02
              • WHO lamenting about terminology? ElMaestro 2020-12-07 14:54
              • WHO lamenting about terminology? d_labes 2020-12-07 15:35
  • WHO frequent deficiencies in protocols and reports Helmut 2020-12-22 19:00
    • "obtain balanced groups" vs randomisation ElMaestro 2020-12-23 08:12