Estimate the sample size HVD [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Yura – Belarus, 2020-12-03 09:47 (1327 d 17:23 ago) – Posting: # 22108
Views: 2,588

Dear all
Still fashionable HVD theme, question.
Am I correct in understanding that if in the literature, for example, CV = 50% for AUC is found as the largest (for Cmax it is also more than 30%, but less than for AUC), then it will not be correct to use sampleN.scABEL to estimate the sample size? There will be no equivalence limits scaling for this parameter. And on the other hand, for the parameter Cmax there will be conditions of forced bioequivalence, since the sample size will be at least twice the allowable size calculated by the AUC parameter. How to proceed?

Regards

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,113 posts in 4,858 threads, 1,644 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t really say “similar” if it’s the same again you want.
“Similar” means something different.    Anthony Burgess

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5