Bug? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-11-29 17:22 (1413 d 12:32 ago) – Posting: # 22094
Views: 7,111

(edited on 2020-11-29 17:57)

Dear Helmut,

❝ PS: Do we have a bug in scABEL()?

CV  <- c(0.3, 0.3+10^(-6:-2))

lim <- scABEL(CV)

res <- data.frame(CV = CV, L = lim[, 1], U = lim[, 2])

print(res, row.names = FALSE)


      CV         L        U

0.300000 0.8000000 1.250000

0.300001 0.8000296 1.249954

0.300010 0.8000244 1.249962

0.300100 0.7999731 1.250042

0.301000 0.7994604 1.250844

0.310000 0.7943616 1.258873


Not a bug :no:, it's a feature :cool:!
Reason: r_const=0.76.
With r_const <- log(1.25)/CV2se(0.3) = 0.7601283... we get
       CV         L        U
 0.300000 0.8000000 1.250000
 0.300001 0.7999994 1.250001
 0.300010 0.7999943 1.250009
 0.300100 0.7999430 1.250089
 0.301000 0.7994302 1.250891
 0.310000 0.7943307 1.258922

Satisfied?

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,249 posts in 4,885 threads, 1,665 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:55 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I believe there is no philosophical high-road in science,
with epistemological signposts. No, we are in a jungle
and find our way by trial and error,
building our road behind us as we proceed.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5