Accepted time deviations in Ambulatory PK intervals [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-11-23 12:49 (1616 d 20:48 ago) – Posting: # 22079
Views: 2,825

Hi ElMaestro and Researcher101,

❝ As I see it, one can make a case for saying that the way to deal with time point deviations should be API-specific as well as time-specific.


Agree. The later in the profile, the less critical deviations are.

❝ Some CROs define a window in terms of time (for each time point)…


See this post and followings. I don’t comprehend why too early sampling should be performed. PK calculations (regardless whether by NCA or by modeling) should always be performed based on the actual time points – otherwise the estimates will be biased.
Extremely nasty in modeling. Both OLS and maximum likelihood approaches require that the independent variable is free of any error. It’s a misconception that errors in the independent variable only increase the residual error. If one wants to deal with that, it get’s really, really tricky (orthogonal regression, where the selection of appropriate weights is black magic).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,670 registered users;
99 visitors (0 registered, 99 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 10:37 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There are two possible outcomes: if the result confirms the
hypothesis, then you’ve made a measurement. If the result is
contrary to the hypothesis, then you’ve made a discovery.    Enrico Fermi

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5