Accepted time deviations in Ambulatory PK intervals [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Researcher101 – Egypt, 2020-11-22 10:52 (149 d 09:34 ago) – Posting: # 22075
Views: 740

» Some CROs define a window in terms of time (for each time point); if the sample is taken with the window then the nominal time is used for PK (for AUC calculation), otherwise the actual time. Some CROs will always use the actual time. Both approaches seem to work well across jurisdictions. The option that does not work is to use nominal time regardless of sampling time.

So if I have a time window 12 h and I have a participant come after 18 h so Will I take this sample or not? Please note that the delay will be considered in the statistics calculations


Edit: Full quote removed. Please delete everything from the text of the original poster which is not necessary in understanding your answer; see also this post #5! Please follow the Forum’s Policy[Helmut]

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 22 (0 registered, 22 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 20:27 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

We have to remember that what we observe is not nature herself,
but nature exposed to our method of questioning.    Werner Heisenberg

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5