highly variable drugs-Cmax [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by wienui  – Germany/Oman, 2020-11-19 19:04 (1251 d 11:17 ago) – Posting: # 22069
Views: 1,971

(edited by wienui on 2020-11-20 07:13)

Hi nuka & Helmut,

❝ According to the GCC guidelines a wider range of Cmax(i.e 75-133%) can be acceptable for HVDP, where it has been demonstrated that the within- subject variability for Cmax of the reference compound in the study is >30%.

❝ But, i have a study which was performed as per Eu guidelines and accordingly, the acceptance criteria for Cmax can be widened to a maximum of 69.84 – 143.19%. Accordingly, the results of Cmax is: 70.46%-141.90%

❝ Need suggestion whether this studies can be acceptable as per GCC guidelines?? :confused::confused:


Unfortunately, we come back again to this point. Although the GCC GL is adopted from the EMA GL,
but the upper cap of scaling is about only 39% and not 50%!!!!
At the moment, I think you could have a good chance under the conditions that your BE study is demonstrated in a replicate design and that the high within-subject variability for Cmax not caused by outliers.

Cheers,
Osama

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,659 registered users;
58 visitors (0 registered, 58 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:22 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

So far as I can remember,
there is not one word in the Gospels
in praise of intelligence.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5