Presentation of data in report and SAS output [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Dear All,
Greetings !!
FDA recommends not to round off the decimal places for confidence intervals.
So for NTI drugs, the Swt, Swr and 95% upper bound and point estimate should be presented upto 2 decimal places without rounding off.
If for Cmax, the 95% upper bound value is 0.0025 and if presented as 0.00, will the study can be considered as pass?
For analysis in SAS, should we present the values in 2 decimals or 4 decimals without rounding off?
As in above criteria, if we present the data in 2 decimal places, the study is pass.
Please guide.
Thanks
Greetings !!
FDA recommends not to round off the decimal places for confidence intervals.
So for NTI drugs, the Swt, Swr and 95% upper bound and point estimate should be presented upto 2 decimal places without rounding off.
If for Cmax, the 95% upper bound value is 0.0025 and if presented as 0.00, will the study can be considered as pass?
For analysis in SAS, should we present the values in 2 decimals or 4 decimals without rounding off?
As in above criteria, if we present the data in 2 decimal places, the study is pass.
Please guide.
Thanks
Complete thread:
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID Biostats 2018-03-29 12:39 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID Helmut 2018-03-29 14:27
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID Biostats 2018-03-30 06:25
- GMR not relevant in ABE Helmut 2018-03-30 11:19
- Presentation of data in report and SAS outputarl_stat 2020-10-15 16:12
- GMR not relevant in ABE Helmut 2018-03-30 11:19
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID Biostats 2018-03-30 06:25
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID jag009 2018-03-29 17:20
- bioequivalence criteria for NTID Helmut 2018-03-29 14:27