Very tricky [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-10-11 10:57 (627 d 01:10 ago) – Posting: # 21992
Views: 1,265

Hi Researcher101,

» […] I wanna dose the participant T1 twice, T2 twice, R Twice as the drug is highly variable?
» The main goal is to check which formula ( T1 or T2 ) is more comparable to the reference drug

OK, you are planning a pilot study. With six periods you are draining volunteers (hope your bioanalytical method can deal with small sample volumes). Dropouts are also an issue. I have never seen a study with more than five periods so far.
I tried to find a balanced incomplete block design (with less than six periods) to no avail… Since you mentioned a Williams’ design in your original post: No idea.

One option would be a Latin Square:

\(\small{\begin{array}{ccccccc}
\hline
& p_1 & p_2 & p_3 & p_4 & p_5 & p_6\\
\hline
s_1 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R}\\
s_2 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1\\
s_3 & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1\\
s_4 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_2\\
s_5 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2\\
s_6 & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R}\\
\hline
\end{array}}\)


Exclusions as usual:

\(\small{\begin{array}{ccccccc}
\hline
& p_1 & p_2 & p_3 & p_4 & p_5 & p_6\\
\hline
s_1 & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \bullet & \bullet & \text{R} & \text{R}\\
s_2 & \text{T}_1 & \bullet & \bullet & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1\\
s_3 & \bullet & \bullet & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1\\
s_4 & \bullet & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \bullet\\
s_5 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \bullet & \bullet\\
s_6 & \text{R} & \text{T}_1 & \text{T}_1 & \bullet & \bullet & \text{R}\\
\hline
\end{array}}\)
\(\small{\begin{array}{ccccccc}
\hline
& p_1 & p_2 & p_3 & p_4 & p_5 & p_6\\
\hline
s_1 & \bullet & \bullet & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R}\\
s_2 & \bullet & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \bullet\\
s_3 & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \bullet & \bullet\\
s_4 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \bullet & \bullet & \text{T}_2\\
s_5 & \text{R} & \text{R} & \bullet & \bullet & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2\\
s_6 & \text{R} & \bullet & \bullet & \text{T}_2 & \text{T}_2 & \text{R}\\
\hline
\end{array}}\)


Select the test with a PE closer to 100% (i.e., \(\small{\textrm{min}\left\{\left|\log_{e}\text{T}_1/\text{R} \right|,\left|\log_{e}\text{T}_2/\text{R} \right|\right\}}\)) for the pivotal study.
If PEs are similar – don’t ask me what “similar” is – opt for the one with lower CVwT.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,181 posts in 4,647 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 12 (1 registered, 11 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 12:07 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity
is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity.    Voltaire

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5