SE of ∆? or what? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-10-02 18:54 (56 d 03:27 ago) – Posting: # 21965
Views: 491

(edited by d_labes on 2020-10-02 19:11)

Dear Helmut,

» now I’m confused.

I think all the confusion comes from that sigmaw, sigmad, sigmadelta values including their estimates
which are used by all the authors cited within this thread in a different meaning.

I'm not able to figure out who is who, what is what. Sorry.

The only thing I'm convinced of is that your formula (2) above is correct.
If you write the confidence interval for the BE decision as
PE(T-R) +- SD(d)*tval(0.95, df)

The rest of your algebra is straight forward.
And correct if you ask me ;-).

BTW: the formula (2) is not the error term in the 2×2×2 crossover.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,214 posts in 4,427 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 21:22 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5