SE of ∆? or what? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-10-02 18:54 (145 d 03:43 ago) – Posting: # 21965
Views: 669

(edited by d_labes on 2020-10-02 19:11)

Dear Helmut,

» now I’m confused.

I think all the confusion comes from that sigmaw, sigmad, sigmadelta values including their estimates
which are used by all the authors cited within this thread in a different meaning.

I'm not able to figure out who is who, what is what. Sorry.

The only thing I'm convinced of is that your formula (2) above is correct.
If you write the confidence interval for the BE decision as
PE(T-R) +- SD(d)*tval(0.95, df)

The rest of your algebra is straight forward.
And correct if you ask me ;-).

BTW: the formula (2) is not the error term in the 2×2×2 crossover.



Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,355 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:38 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It is better to be wrong than to be vague.
In trial and error, the error is the true essential.    Freeman Dyson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz