Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum

SE of ∆? or what? [General Statistics]

posted by d_labes – Berlin, Germany, 2020-10-02 20:54 (901 d 23:05 ago) – Posting: # 21965
Views: 1,617

Dear Helmut,

❝ now I’m confused.

I think all the confusion comes from that sigma_w, sigma_d, sigma_delta values including their estimates
which are used by all the authors cited within this thread in a different meaning.

I'm not able to figure out who is who, what is what. Sorry.

The only thing I'm convinced of is that your formula (2) above is correct.
If you write the confidence interval for the BE decision as
PE(T-R) +- SD_(d)*tval(0.95, df)

The rest of your algebra is straight forward.
And correct if you ask me ;-)

.

BTW: the formula (2) is not the error term in the 2×2×2 crossover.

—
Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Adjusted indirect comparisons: Algebra Helmut 2020-10-01 16:41 [General Statistics]
- Adjusted indirect comparisons: Algebra d_labes 2020-10-01 17:03
  - Adjusted indirect comparisons: Typo Helmut 2020-10-01 17:13
- SE of ∆? Helmut 2020-10-02 14:56
  - SE of ∆? or what?d_labes 2020-10-02 18:54
    - SE of ∆ Helmut 2020-10-02 22:29
      - SE of ∆ d_labes 2020-10-04 10:23

SE of ∆? or what? [General Sta­tis­tics]

Complete thread:

SE of ∆? or what? [General Statistics]