SE of ∆? or what? [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-10-02 20:54 (1379 d 21:03 ago) – Posting: # 21965
Views: 2,422

Dear Helmut,

❝ now I’m confused.


I think all the confusion comes from that sigmaw, sigmad, sigmadelta values including their estimates
which are used by all the authors cited within this thread in a different meaning.

I'm not able to figure out who is who, what is what. Sorry.

The only thing I'm convinced of is that your formula (2) above is correct.
If you write the confidence interval for the BE decision as
PE(T-R) +- SD(d)*tval(0.95, df)

The rest of your algebra is straight forward.
And correct if you ask me ;-).

BTW: the formula (2) is not the error term in the 2×2×2 crossover.

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,099 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,646 registered users;
40 visitors (0 registered, 40 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:58 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded
if you tied them the usual way.
This happens to us all the time with computers,
and nobody thinks of complaining.    Jef Raskin

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5