Wow! [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-09-28 17:51 (29 d 01:50 ago) – Posting: # 21948
Views: 310

Dear Helmut!

» we know for a good while that under certain conditions the type I error might be inflated. However, seemingly European assessors were either not aware of it or ignored it. Last week I saw a deficiency letter (don’t ask for the country):

… in case of a value of 30% < CVRR <45%, it is recommended to check the control of the patient's risk type I error at the level of 5%. If an alpha adjustment is necessary, it is recommended that a BE estimate for the new CI of the T/R ratio be submitted to meet the extended bounds.

Kudos! Almost correct. The area of inflated TIEs may reach below 30% and only rarely (say, for a full replicate in 24 subjects) to 45%.

Can't say only: Wow! :clap:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 18:42 CET (Europe/Vienna)

No computer has ever been designed
that is ever aware of what it’s doing;
but most of the time, we aren’t either.    Marvin Minsky

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5