Wow! [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-09-28 17:51 (204 d 09:40 ago) – Posting: # 21948
Views: 560

Dear Helmut!

» we know for a good while that under certain conditions the type I error might be inflated. However, seemingly European assessors were either not aware of it or ignored it. Last week I saw a deficiency letter (don’t ask for the country):

… in case of a value of 30% < CVRR <45%, it is recommended to check the control of the patient's risk type I error at the level of 5%. If an alpha adjustment is necessary, it is recommended that a BE estimate for the new CI of the T/R ratio be submitted to meet the extended bounds.

Kudos! Almost correct. The area of inflated TIEs may reach below 30% and only rarely (say, for a full replicate in 24 subjects) to 45%.

Can't say only: Wow! :clap:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,510 registered users;
online 17 (0 registered, 17 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 03:32 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In the Middles Ages the lingua franca of science was Latin.
Nowadays the language of science is bad English.    Anonymous

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5