Wow! [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by d_labes  – Berlin, Germany, 2020-09-28 19:51 (1333 d 09:58 ago) – Posting: # 21948
Views: 1,936

Dear Helmut!

❝ we know for a good while that under certain conditions the Type I Error (TIE) might be inflated. However, seemingly European assessors were either not aware of it or ignored it. Last week I saw a deficiency letter (don’t ask for the country):

… in case of a value of 30% < CVRR <45%, it is recommended to check the control of the patient's risk type I error at the level of 5%. If an alpha adjustment is necessary, it is recommended that a BE estimate for the new CI of the T/R ratio be submitted to meet the extended bounds.


❝ Kudos! Almost correct. The area of inflated TIEs may reach below 30% and only rarely (say, for a 4-period full replicate in 24 subjects) to 45%.


Can say only: Wow! :clap:

Regards,

Detlew

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,035 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,645 registered users;
46 visitors (0 registered, 46 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:50 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The mediocre teacher tells.
The good teacher explains.
The superior teacher demonstrates.
The great teacher inspires.    William Arthur Ward

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5