EMA dataset I (PHX/WNL 8.1) [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-08-20 03:05 (1539 d 23:28 ago) – Posting: # 21892
Views: 3,460

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ ❝ A correlation >1 is funny.


❝ In a way you can compare it with the CoA of a reference standard which is labeled with purity = 101.2 %. It does not contain 101.2% - I guarantee it :-D - but that may stil be the most viable estimate.


That’s another cup of tea. I guarantee that it can contain exactly 101.2% indeed – regardless what the CoA says. ;-)

❝ It is all about how we estimate / measure it. We are not guaranteed to get the same model maximum likelihood if you keep the rho controlled between (exactly) -1 to (exactly) 1 with any iterative method regardless of your tolerance setting on the x- or y-scale.


Here you are right despite some weirdos laments.* The largest correlation in my 500 simulated data sets was for #168 with 7.285 (‼)…



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,288 posts in 4,890 threads, 1,659 registered users;
64 visitors (0 registered, 64 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: 01:34 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are no dangerous thoughts;
thinking itself is dangerous.    Hannah Arendt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5